Liftbrief / Scorecard

What would a completed charter comparison look like?

The following is entirely illustrative. It does not represent market prices, actual suppliers or a tax calculation. Assume the same approved mission, a USD 40,000 expenditure ceiling and final tax-inclusive quoted amounts.

Commercial comparisonSupplier ASupplier B
Headline quoteUSD 30,000USD 39,000
Separately quoted positioningUSD 4,000Included
Separately quoted crew and airport costsUSD 2,000Included
Known mission expenditureUSD 36,000USD 39,000
Named de-icing scenarioUp to USD 2,000 extraIncluded
Expenditure in that scenarioUp to USD 38,000USD 39,000
Supplier-caused aircraft unavailabilityRefund; replacement premium paid by buyerDocumented replacement process and agreed cost protection
Material substitutionBroad supplier discretionBuyer-approved suitability boundaries

Use the on-demand weights:

CriterionWeightA ratingA pointsB ratingB points
Operator assurance15412412
Mission suitability15515515
Total cost and value15412412
Recovery1526515
Cancellation and substitution102448
Access-model fit54444
Prepayment and exit104848
Insurance and risk allocation54444
Service, privacy and records54444
Business justification54444
Total1007386

The equal cost-and-value ratings reflect different strengths: A has lower expenditure but a conditional charge; B has broader inclusion at a higher price. The reviewer must document that judgement rather than awarding the lowest headline price an automatic five.

Decision: B is the preferred candidate if all eligibility gates pass. A needs renegotiation because recovery and substitution protection fall below the proposed minimums. This conclusion does not claim B will save money or guarantee arrival.

If B’s prepayment evidence were missing, replace its eight points in criterion 7 with U: report 78–88/100, 90% evidence coverage, hold until that issue is resolved.