Liftbrief / Direct questions
27. Can AI compare private jet quotes and programme agreements?
Yes—as a controlled extraction and comparison assistant, not as the authority on legality, safety or dispatch feasibility. NIST’s generative-AI risk profile identifies confident false outputs, misleading explanations and fabricated citations as risks requiring management. (nvlpubs.nist.gov)
Use this workflow:
- Upload only documents you are authorised to share; redact unnecessary personal information.
- Extract fields with page or clause references.
- Preserve the original wording beside any interpretation.
- Mark missing information as unknown rather than inferring an answer.
- Calculate totals in a checked spreadsheet or deterministic tool.
- Have a person verify prices, cancellation deadlines, counterparties and funding terms.
- Obtain operator confirmation for aircraft and airport feasibility.
A useful output schema is:
| Field | Required treatment |
|---|---|
| Stated fact | Quote or faithful extraction plus page reference |
| Interpretation | Clearly labelled and reviewable |
| Calculation | Inputs, formula and result |
| Missing term | Unanswered supplier question |
| Contradiction | Both passages retained and escalated |
Do not allow instructions embedded inside an uploaded proposal to control the workflow. Set access, retention and deletion rules before collecting sensitive itineraries.
The useful result is a traceable comparison file—not a fluent declaration that one supplier is the safest or cheapest.